Back to Documentation

Zero-Knowledge Proof Protocol

Protocol Design and Verification Systems

5.1 Protocol Definition

Given relation R(x,w) (e.g., "C opens to m,r"), the prover generates:

π ← Prove(x,w), b ← Verify(x,π)

such that the following properties hold:

Security Properties

  • Completeness: Honest prover convinces honest verifier
  • Soundness: Cheating prover succeeds with negligible probability
  • Zero-Knowledge: Simulator produces π indistinguishable from real

5.2 Recent Protocol Advances

Recent protocols—Libra, deVirgo, Orion, Pianist—push proof generation to linear time and sub-kilobyte proofs. These advances enable:

  • Efficient proof generation for complex statements
  • Compact proof sizes suitable for blockchain deployment
  • Fast verification times for real-time applications
  • Scalable zero-knowledge systems

Completeness

If the statement is true and the prover follows the protocol honestly, the verifier will accept the proof with overwhelming probability.

Soundness

If the statement is false, no cheating prover can convince an honest verifier to accept the proof, except with negligible probability.

Protocol Implementation

Proof Generation

The prover constructs a proof π that demonstrates knowledge of the witness w without revealing any information about w itself.

Proof Verification

The verifier checks the proof π against the public statement x to ensure the claimed relationship holds without learning the witness.

Zero-Knowledge Property

A simulator can generate proofs that are computationally indistinguishable from real proofs, ensuring no information leakage.

Transaction Chain Validation

A user transfer from value v to v' proceeds as follows:

  1. Create Cin = C(v,r)
  2. Compute delta Δ = v' - v and form Cout = Cin · C(Δ,r')
  3. Produce ZK proof π of knowledge of v,r,r' and non-negativity constraints
  4. Broadcast (Cout, π)
  5. Validators check Verify(Cout, π) = 1 and include in epoch Ti+1

Performance Considerations

  • • Linear-time proof generation for practical deployment
  • • Sub-kilobyte proof sizes for efficient transmission
  • • Fast verification times for real-time validation
  • • Scalable proof systems for high-throughput applications
Thank You

Special thanks to the community members and selfless volunteers who contributed reviews, feedback, and technical insights to make this documentation possible.

Błażej and Jai Santos
Cryptographic ReviewersProtocol Contributors